Friday, February 28, 2014

Indo-Japanese engagement - the only pivot of Asia?

Over the last decade, there has been a lot of chatter in the international strategic circles about the so-called Asian pivot in US foreign policy. The shape of that pivot has been imagined at various levels - the Sino-US G2 grouping, the trilaternal Indo-US-Japan or even the quadrilateral Indo-US-Aus-Japan "blocs". However, two developments have put paid to most of the assumptions. One, an increasingly inward looking US posture over the last decade - a lot of people missed the latest round of major cuts in US defence budgets. Two, the rapid rise of China as the second largest politico-military power in the world, importantly someone with no evangelical enthusiasm on its ideology (which means it poses no threat to the American homeland, or even its "near abroad".)

Consequently, rest of Asia has to fend for itself while dealing with an increasingly assertive and aggressive China. Contrary to the propaganda, China has territorial disputes pending with many of its neighbours - Japan, Vietnam, Russia and of course, India. China's enormous trade heft too automatically causes friction with large parts of mercantile Asia (ASEAN).

In this context, the only initiative of heft and context that is emerging is the Indo-Japan engagement. Interestingly, a lot of the heavy lifting in this case has come from Japan. Note the following developments:

1. Shinzo Abe, in his recent visit to India, signed a deal to sell the Japanese US2 amphibious aircraft to India. For those who missed the point, the "pacifist", post-WWII Japan has had a stated policy of not exporting any military hardware. In terms of its impact on changing internal political calculus, this is almost as big as George W Bush breaking the "non proliferation consensus" in US policy during the Indo-US nuclear deal.

2. Last year, while the rupee went on a tailspin on the back of the tapering announcement by the US Fed, the big backstop came in the form of a Japanese currency swap agreement, worth 50 billion dollars. What it meant was that India had access to 50 billion dollars of Japanese reserves in case it wanted to. This, along with a slew of other measures restored stability in the currency. Though India has had to swap a single dollar yet from this arrangement, the impact on sentiment has been decisive, partly responsible for the rupee being the best performing emerging market currency this year!

This is just a start. Obviously, the Shinzo Abe led government (Shinzo Abe's grandfather, enjoyed great relations with Jawaharlal Nehru and India in his time as PM) is investing a lot in the Indian relationship. The reason is simple, India is the only state with the requisite military and economic heft in Asia to be able to be able to be a "swing state" in any face-off with China. All other Asian states are either too small, or too weak (militarily) or too poor or indeed too beholden to China to offer meaningful support in such a vneture.

It would be up to the new government in Delhi to grasp this relationship with both hands and some more, and take it to a new level. Most of the actionables immediately of course, would be internal!
 

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Somnath,

    As someone who also follows what is happening in east Asia and the large geopolitical game being played in Asia. I think your analysis is spot on.

    In asia, there are three powers. Japan which is the "has been power", china "the rising power" and India "the potential power". Japan which ruled china in the earlier 20th century can't do so or even manage china any more. China is too strong economically and militarily and this dis-balance is going to grow in the future. And as you rightly pointed out, the only country which will have the people and the resources to stand up to china in the future is India.

    My question is does it make sense for India to go into an alliance against china. Yes, china so far has not behaved like a good neighbor (arming pakistan with nukes), and from time to time keeps claiming arunachal. But beyond that has not really tried to change the status quo.

    It might be in india's interest to actually keep out of the fights that china is picking with all its neighbors without actually formally allying with japan or the US, till the time India itself is strong enough to do so.

    I would say we should emulate what china did since 1990. Remember their slogan, "peaceful rise". They basically spent the last 20 years building up their economy. In the process, they swallowed all insults (bombing of their embassy in belgrade) etc. Only when they had a strong economy did they start flexing their muscles.

    what do you think?

    amit poddar

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Amit

    I don't think India would ever enter into a formal alliance against China. The best position for India would remain to be as a "tilt" power

    ReplyDelete